| Campsites Den Haag |
- Vakantiepark Kijkduinpark
|
|
| Area |
- Campsites Leidschendam, 8 km
- Campsites Delft, 12 km
- Campsites Wassenaar, 13 km
- Campsites Delfgauw, 14 km
- Campsites Monster, 16 km
- Campsites 's-Gravenzande, 20 km
- Campsites Katwijk aan Zee, 22 km
- Campsites Rijnsburg, 22 km
- Campsites Hoek van Holland, 24 km
- Campsites Zevenhuizen, 29 km
|
|
|
 |
Vakantiepark Kijkduinpark ****
|
| Review: |
 3.6 (14)
|
| Position: |
No. 60 of 70 in South Holland & Utrecht
|
|
| Address: |
Machiel Vrijenhoeklaan 450
2555 NW Den Haag (South Holland & Utrecht)
Netherlands
|
|
| Area: |
North Sea
|
| Setting: |
Sea, Easy access to main routes, City |
|
| Phone: |
+31 (0)70 4482100
|
| Fax: |
+31 (0)70 3232457
|
|
| Internet: |
E-mail
Website
|
|
|
|
Review of Vakantiepark Kijkduinpark
| Average Overall Rating |
3.6 
|
| Area |
4.5
|
Site |
3.6
|
Accommodation |
2.8
|
| Leisure |
3.9
|
Service |
3.3
|
Sanitary facilities |
3.4
|
|
| |
14 Reviews
|
nicht zu empfehlen, sehr mekrwürdiges Geschäftsgeb
Review of Thomas from Thuringia / Germany, November 2013
Language of the review: 
Travel date: October 2013
Age:
40-49 years
Length of stay:
4-7 Days
Type of accommodation:
Caravan (personal)
Booking:
Campsite/Tourist Resort
Der Platz liegt gut, auch bei starkem Sturm hatten wir mit dem Vorzelt keine Probleme. Allerdings mit dem Service (dazu unten mehr) und der Anlage:
1) Gleich beim Aufbau des Vorzeltes bin ich in einen Hundehaufen getreten;
2) den angekündigten kabelanschluss gab es bei unserem Stellplatz nicht und
3) es gibt keine Ausschilderung "Ausgang" auf dem Gelände, was uns mehrmals zu Spazierfahrten geführt hat.
Diese drei Sachen sind für mich aber nicht so bedeutsam. Mit dem Hundekot, das kann vorkommen, aber wünschenwert wären schon Hinweise, dass doch bitte die Hundehalter usw.; fernsehen wollte ich sowieso nicht, und das Herumgekurve... am zweiten tag hat man sich das dann auch so gemerkt. Wirklich ärgerlich das das Geschäftsgebaren:
Mit der Reservierung wurde nicht nur eine zusätzliche Gebühr, sondern auch der ganze Betrag (nicht etwa nur eine Anzahlung) fällig.
Bereits vor unserem geplanten Reiseantritt stand fest, dass der Anreisetermin für uns aus gesundheitlichen Gründen nicht machbar sein würde. Deswegen hatte ich mich zwei tage vorher telefonisch an den Zeltplatz gewendet und das geschildert.
Die Mitarbeiterin teilte mir mit, dass es zwei Möglichkeiten gäbe:
Stornierung eines Teils der Buchung, was aber bedeutet, dass ich 90% der Kosten nicht zurückerhielte
Umbuchung, was mit Umbuchungskosten verbunden wäre.
Da wir die Reise nur um einige Tage verschieben wollten, haben wir uns für die Umbuchung entschieden und in Anbetracht der Situation (ich wußte nicht, wann ich tatsächlich würde fahren können) verabredet, dass die Mitarbeiterin einen entsprechenden Eintrag in die Buchungsunterlagen macht.
Auf dem Campingplatz habe ich dann nachgefragt, ob das alles klar geht und wie es mit der Verrechnung sein würde (die gebuchten Nächte waren teurer als die genutzten, dafür wäre unsererseits die Umbuchungsgebühr fällig gewesen) und zu meiner Überraschung wurde mir mitgeteilt, dass eine Umbuchung nicht ginge und wir am ursprünglich geplanten Termin abreisen müßten oder zusätzliche Tage buchen und auch zusätzlich zahlen müßten. Das ist ein sehr merkwürdiges Geschäftsgebaren! Dazu muss man wissen, dass der Zeltplatz nur zu einem Bruchteil belegt war und unser Standplatz nach unserer Abreise leer war! Dem Campingplatz wären keine zusätzlichen Kosten entstanden, im Gegenteil. Wir hatten von den fünf bezahlten Nächten drei am Wochenende (die teurer sind) und zwei am Mo & Di. Wir wollten unseren Aufenthalt dann einfach nach hinten um einen Tag verlängern.
An der Rezeption wurde mir empfohlen, mich im Nachhinein zu beschweren, das ist aber ergebnislos; auf mein Anliegen und die Frage, wieso mir etwas durch das Unternehmen empfohlen wird, dessen Umsetzung dann aber gar nicht vorgesehen ist, bekam ich keine Antwort. Offenbar kommt es der Geschäftsführung mehr darauf an, Geld zu verdienen, als zufriedene Kunden zu haben.
|
|
| Overall |
2.0
|
|
| Area: |
4.0
|
| Site |
2.0
|
| Accommodation |
1.0
|
| Leisure |
2.0
|
| Service |
1.0
|
| Sanitary facilities |
2.0
|
Value for money:
"bad"
|
|
|
Never again
Review of Michael from North Rhine-Westphalia / Germany, June 2010
Language of the review:
Travel date: June 2010
Age:
40-49 years
Length of stay:
1-3 Days
Type of accommodation:
Camper (personal)
Booking:
Campsite/Tourist Resort
Have been there with two other families a night. The pitches unkempt, unclean toilets, five showers in the women's field were only three men in the field of five, only four, not even lukewarm water. Generally dirty and stinky toilets, sinks, and partly broken by the waste collection station only to mention. And for 40 €. For comparison: A night before the night on a five-star room for 32 € of his money is more than value.
|
|
| Overall |
1.8
|
|
| Area: |
4.0
|
| Site |
1.0
|
| Accommodation |
1.0
|
| Leisure |
3.0
|
| Service |
1.0
|
| Sanitary facilities |
1.0
|
Value for money:
"very bad"
Do you generally like animation program?
"No for children and adults"
|
|
|
Excellent location
Review of Aurélie from Picardie / France, July 2010
Language of the review: 
Travel date: August 2009
Age:
20-29 years
Length of stay:
4-7 Days
Type of accommodation:
Mobile home (rental)
Booking:
Another offerer
We had a very good holiday. The site is very nice, very friendly housing, near the beach and the quietness was the rendezvous. We expect to return this summer to enjoy this pleasant site.
|
|
| Overall |
3.8
|
|
| Area: |
4.0
|
| Site |
5.0
|
| Accommodation |
4.0
|
| Leisure |
3.0
|
| Service |
3.0
|
| Sanitary facilities |
4.0
|
Value for money:
"average"
Particularly recommendable for
"Families"
I award a prize as
"Top nature holidays"
Do you generally like animation program?
"I don't care"
|
|
|
Ok
Review of Mona Lisa from Schleswig-Holstein / Germany, September 2009
Language of the review:
Travel date: June 2009
Age:
20-29 years
Length of stay:
8-14 Days
Type of accommodation:
Caravan (personal)
Booking:
Eurocamp
The only thing I was totally annoyed, that was the entertainment for children, it was far too loud and very nevig.Wir could not even eat in peace our pizza on the terrace of the pizzeria, because in the background, this horrible music war.Und the sanitary had something to be cleaner, but it was noch.Die cleaning needed only every morning for so long, that the ladies had on the men's room, which was rather unpleasant! Otherwise it was a lovely family holiday and the surrounding area + the beach were beautiful!
|
|
| Overall |
3.8
|
|
| Area: |
5.0
|
| Site |
4.0
|
| Accommodation |
4.0
|
| Leisure |
4.0
|
| Service |
3.0
|
| Sanitary facilities |
3.0
|
Value for money:
"average"
Particularly recommendable for
"Families"
Do you generally like animation program?
"Yes for children and adults"
|
|
|
Holiday 2009
Review of Hartmut from North Rhine-Westphalia / Germany, September 2009
Language of the review:
Travel date: August 2009
Age:
60-69 years
Length of stay:
8-14 Days
Type of accommodation:
Summer cottage
Booking:
Campsite/Tourist Resort
Unfortunately, the rooms were not clean on arrival, even worse in the shower.
We had to clean only the rooms and the sanitary facilities.
The sleeping rooms for children are too small, there exists no possibility to sit laundry, because there is no closet in the room is.
|
|
| Overall |
4.5
|
|
| Area: |
5.0
|
| Site |
5.0
|
| Accommodation |
3.0
|
| Leisure |
5.0
|
| Service |
5.0
|
| Sanitary facilities |
4.0
|
|
|
|
...
Review of Wir! from Lower Saxony / Germany, April 2009
Language of the review:
Review is based on the year: 2009
We were there this Easter =)
I personally must say that it is contrary to all the allegations was VERY clean.
For us young people (5 14 year olds there was very very nice ...
From the beautiful beach on a day also clean the beach, until the evening meet with other on a trampoline, there is really everything.
We were never bored ;)...
And what is written nowhere, is the fact that there's a totally beautiful lake there, although not to swim, but it was nice anyway.
An initial problem was the gate for us: p
For over 18 clock, you still out, but no longer pure, if the card is not mithatt xD
But this problem was solved quickly, because in her Retzepton always could, but about 11 and it was all about ...
We believe that this camp vorallendingen for parents with teenagers / children, because everywhere in the vicinity of playgrounds, or else to find!
|
|
| Overall |
5.0
|
|
| Area: |
5.0
|
| Site |
5.0
|
| Accommodation |
5.0
|
| Leisure |
5.0
|
| Service |
5.0
|
| Sanitary facilities |
5.0
|
Particularly recommendable for
"Young person"
|
|
|
Pure Disappointment
Review of Customer from North Rhine-Westphalia / Germany, November 2008
Language of the review:
Review is based on the year: 2008
Hello!
We were now on the 21.11.2008 on the camping part Kuijduinpark.Wir were sort of disappointed that we again on Saturday morning bearings worn pitches in a neglected state, flew everywhere rubbish around the worst of the garbage containers, so there were the 40 cans on the Boden.Es was no water on the Zapfstellen.Das open Sanitärgebüde smelled unpleasant and what we are most excited is the fact that we previously had inquired by phone us whether dogs with dürfen.Das on the investment is also allowed, only wants you then go to the restaurant will be pointed out that there no dogs are allowed sind.Wir lot have already had some experience but the dogs are not allowed in a restaurant although it is allowed on the court, was for us a new experience.
Never again Kuijduinpark Camping Den Haag.
|
|
| Overall |
2.5
|
|
| Area: |
3.0
|
| Site |
2.0
|
| Accommodation |
3.0
|
| Leisure |
3.0
|
| Service |
2.0
|
| Sanitary facilities |
2.0
|
|
|
|
Ladies and Gentlemen
Review of Customer from Baden-Württemberg / Germany, November 2008
Language of the review:
Review is based on the year: 2008
I think its very good camping park pitches are large enough and with the water supply and sewerage connection on the pitch very good very good buying opportunity is a good thing
The camping park is anyone to recommend
Ps The Bußpentelverkehr from the camping park in the city is a great thing
|
|
| Overall |
5.0
|
|
| Area: |
5.0
|
| Site |
5.0
|
| Accommodation |
5.0
|
| Leisure |
5.0
|
| Service |
5.0
|
| Sanitary facilities |
5.0
|
Particularly recommendable for
"Seniors"
|
|
|
Our holiday August 2008
Review of Customer from Lower Saxony / Germany, September 2008
Language of the review:
Review is based on the year: 2008
Hello,
So on the whole the holiday was nice but unfortunately too short, as so often is.
The camp itself is really nice but the sites slightly expensive (since it only "luxury places" there with electricity and water) and ensure that it is so expensive, it was not even clean, the space next to us was dirty and only 2 left days later cleaned although we have pointed out, it came also to visit some animals to get at the garbage to enjoy.
Otherwise, the system is nicely done and the shopping possibilities are in order.
Should I, however, again in the Kijkduinpark then most ambitious in a cottage where I was for my self am responsible environment.
Insofar as much fun on holiday
Greetings R. ..
|
|
| Overall |
3.5
|
|
| Area: |
5.0
|
| Site |
3.0
|
| Accommodation |
2.0
|
| Leisure |
5.0
|
| Service |
3.0
|
| Sanitary facilities |
3.0
|
|
|
|
Schade
Review of Customer from Germany, August 2008
Language of the review:
Review is based on the year: 2008
We were there in June, unfortunately, were the toilet facilities for men closed, so we had to the lady .... it was not even a hint that has been written so that the ladies always had geschimpft where a man went on and off ..... also not very clean .... do not even toilet paper or hand-dry paper was available ..... the environment and the grounds are quite beautiful ..... and it is equal to the sea .. .
But it is for this condition easy to EXPENSIVE !!!!!!
Shame .....
|
|
| Overall |
2.8
|
|
| Area: |
4.0
|
| Site |
3.0
|
| Accommodation |
1.0
|
| Leisure |
3.0
|
| Service |
3.0
|
| Sanitary facilities |
3.0
|
|
|
|
There was once ...
Review of Customer from North Rhine-Westphalia / Germany, July 2009
Language of the review:
Review is based on the year: 2007
... a really nice facility with clean places u Santäreinrichtungen. Unfortunately this is no longer the case. Also the staff is rather unfriendly, especially if one country is German :-(
I personally think that this plant actually good for all, since it playgrounds, a restaurant, Aunt Emma u are a great beach. The area also has one or other of interest to offer u if the weather permitting, you can try on the price / performance ratio of the square hinwegzusehen u afterwards from a great vacation to speak: o)
|
|
| Overall |
3.3
|
|
| Area: |
5.0
|
| Site |
3.0
|
| Accommodation |
1.0
|
| Leisure |
5.0
|
| Service |
3.0
|
| Sanitary facilities |
3.0
|
Particularly recommendable for
"Families"
|
|
|
Answer to Question
Review of Customer from North Rhine-Westphalia / Germany, November 2007
Language of the review:
Review is based on the year: 2007
Ladies and Gentlemen,
the system is good,
We have, however, a baby in the sanitary facilities and misses
two showers was over an extended period defective.
|
|
| Overall |
4.2
|
|
| Area: |
5.0
|
| Site |
4.0
|
| Accommodation |
4.0
|
| Leisure |
4.0
|
| Service |
4.0
|
| Sanitary facilities |
4.0
|
Particularly recommendable for
"Families"
|
|
|
Holiday Kijkduin
Review of ?? from North Rhine-Westphalia / Germany, August 2007
Language of the review:
Review is based on the year: 2007
As for our vacation week ALBATROS rented bungalow, it was not clear to me that our house NOT 2 toilets would have. Only one toilet on the ground floor to have had more than 6 people uncomfortable. The bungalows are very well equipped - you see them but unfortunately, that this resort 'in years' is ... The toilet was dirty and the house was not really clean ... Nevertheless, we are extremely well-liked and we like to come again - in a clean house with 2 toilets!
PS: We had a bungalow Albatros No. 52 (private).
|
|
| Overall |
4.5
|
|
| Area: |
5.0
|
| Site |
5.0
|
| Accommodation |
3.0
|
| Leisure |
4.0
|
| Service |
5.0
|
| Sanitary facilities |
5.0
|
Particularly recommendable for
"Families"
|
|
|
Not more times what it was!
Review of Kijkduinpark from North Rhine-Westphalia / Germany, July 2006
Language of the review:
Review is based on the year: 2006
For years I go to Holland and there is always at this place! (Kijkduinpark). Unfortunately, there have changed, prices have risen into the pitfall, the hygiene leaves much to be desired now on!
And with the ease, it is also far from the truth!
I'm seriously disappointed in the last year, came home and it was clear this was a farewell forever!
And after nearly 6 years, I always back in joyful expectation for Kijkduinpark I drove!
Shame on you!
|
|
| Overall |
3.2
|
|
| Area: |
4.0
|
| Site |
3.0
|
| Accommodation |
2.0
|
| Leisure |
4.0
|
| Service |
3.0
|
| Sanitary facilities |
3.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
Distances *
* Distance information is extrapolated based on airline distance.
weather (Amsterdam, 29.11.2023, 00:25 / local time)
|
shower
|
Pressure: |
1002 hPa |
| Humidity: |
93 % |
| Current: |
3º C |
Wind: |
west |
| Maximum: |
5º C |
Wind force: |
Gentle breeze,
12 km/h |
| Minimum: |
1º C |
|
|
Climate Den Haag
Max. Temperature Min. Temperature Water Temperature [°C]
|
|
| Month |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
|
| Max °C |
6 | 7 | 10 | 14 | 17 | 20 | 22 | 21 | 19 | 14 | 10 | 7 |
| Min °C |
1 | 1 | 3 | 6 | 9 | 12 | 14 | 14 | 11 | 8 | 5 | 2 |
| Water °C |
5 | 5 | 6 | 8 | 11 | 13 | 16 | 17 | 16 | 14 | 10 | 8 |
| Sun |
4 | 5 | 7 | 10 | 11 | 11 | 11 | 10 | 8 | 6 | 5 | 4 |
|
Tags
|
camping, bungalow, chalet, campings, bungalows, chalets, stacaravan, vakantiepark, vakantieparken, bungalowpark, vakantiehuis, stacaravans
|
|
3.6 (14)
